Rights Management and Digital Library Requirements
From Rights Management and Digital Library Requirements:
Introduction
It is common to hear members of the digital library community debating the relative merits of the two most common rights expression languages (RELs) - the Open Digital Rights Language (ODRL) and the rights language developed for the Motion Picture Expert Group (MPEG) and recently adopted by the International Organization for Standardization [1] - and which is preferable for digital library systems. Such debates are, in my opinion, premature and should be postponed until this community has developed a clear set of requirements for rights management in its environment, including rights expression, the encoding of license terms, and file protection.
This article is intended to provoke discussion of those requirements, and it attempts to do so by illustrating aspects of the current developments in rights management that may be problematic for digital libraries. This does not mean that the digital library community will need to develop its own rights language and rights management solution, separate from the existing standards in this area. It means that at this moment in time we do not have sufficient information about our own rights management needs to evaluate any particular solution nor to negotiate for extensions to accommodate digital library functionality.
- the role of digital libraries (DLs) and open access in scholarly communication - Jan 05, 2005
- Internet Archive to build alternative to Google - Jan 02, 2005
- Open Source Software and Libraries Bibliography - Nov 28, 2004
- presenting at ASIS&T 2004 - Nov 12, 2004
- paper superior to digital technology for archiving - Aug 19, 2004
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Rights Management and Digital Library Requirements.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.kmentor.com/mtcgi/mt-tb.cgi/327

Leave a comment