bad scientific/technology journalism or ...
In the Supercomputers Think Fast with New Software article there is no mention of the word 'think', even though it is in the title/subject of the article.
Is this just intentionally bad journalism intended to get people to read the article because they believe computers and thinking are interesting conjectures, or, the journalist really does not know that computers (even supercomputers) can really think but only process information/data.
Talking about social construction of concepts. What goes on in those people's minds who believe computers can think? Do they believe that computers are always right and/or should always be trusted as such?
- nodes, or actors, or networks - Jul 01, 2003
- actor construction? - Jun 30, 2003
- Information Relevance - Jun 29, 2003
- Information and time relevance/aboutness - Jun 29, 2003
- statements, reports, and measures for KM - Jun 26, 2003
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: bad scientific/technology journalism or ....
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.kmentor.com/mtcgi/mt-tb.cgi/285
Leave a comment