the "perfect design" yardstick

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

In Perfect design? Beth informs us of a book attempting to explain why there is no perfect design.

I would be interested to see what methodology the author has applied to explain the 'impossibility' of perfect design. Certainly, the actor-network methodology is a very good candidate to explain this, as it provides the necessary framework and theoretical background to explain the interplay between various actors (humans and things) and how they affect each other.

However, a simplistic explanation might be that since there is no yardstick to measure the 'perfect' of something, it is even pointless to assume perfectness. Rather, we are talking of things feasible and practical.

Similar entries:

- nodes, or actors, or networks - Jul 01, 2003

- actor construction? - Jun 30, 2003

- Information Relevance - Jun 29, 2003

- Information and time relevance/aboutness - Jun 29, 2003

- statements, reports, and measures for KM - Jun 26, 2003

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: the "perfect design" yardstick.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.kmentor.com/mtcgi/mt-tb.cgi/181

Leave a comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Mentor Cana published on September 23, 2003 8:22 PM.

The Year of the Blog: Weblogs in the Writing Classroom was the previous entry in this blog.

The Age of Corporate Open Source Enlightenment is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

August 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            
Powered by Movable Type 4.21-en
blog (author) = Mentor Cana, Ph.D. Candidate in Information Science at SCILS - Rutgers University.